Ideas that Impact
  • Ideas that Impact
  • SE101: Socent

Background: Why consider Passive Participants in a Conflict? [2 of 12]

3/2/2008

0 Comments

 
Passive Participation in Conflict submit to War, Reconciliation and Healing [Main Post with PDF]
Passive Participation in Conflict: A Framework for Reclaiming Wholeness  [1 of 12]
Framework to Identify Passive Participants in Conflict (PPiC)   [3 of 12]
II.  Background: Why consider Passive Participants in a Conflict?

In the aftermath of conflict, justice efforts traditionally focus on the highest-level perpetrators of violence and oppression.  This punitive justice, such as war crimes tribunals, focuses on severe, public punishment of high-ranking officials. Societal condemnation of violence perpetrated by those in power remains a favored strategy for redress atrocities committed during war and conflict.

There remains a struggle within post-conflict and transitional justice communities regarding the degree of culpability imposed upon individual perpetrators of lesser crimes including complicity in these crimes.  While culpability of the “leaders” is agreed upon, there remains discomfort in punishing those ‘merely’ following orders. Perhaps they may have complied involuntarily due to fear for their lives or their family’s well-being.  Further, individuals who neither speak out nor act in support are generally immune from culpability for their lack of action.

Recognizing the inadequacy of prosecuting only top officials to heal communities and to promote lasting peace, recent post-conflict justice has included reconciliation within communities and focused on emotional injuries stemming from the conflict.  This approach addresses individual suffering through direct dialogue between victims and perpetrators, such as the truth and reconciliation hearings in South Africa and the guacas courts in Rwanda.  Over the last century, additional strategies to redress conflict injustice have included restitution, economic remuneration, and formal  ‘apologies’.  Nonetheless, the safeguards of justice and the perceived need to “move on” in post-conflict situations result in incomplete justice, and thus, incomplete healing.

Unacknowledged injustice can have crippling effects on individuals and society; when unhealed, this injury may be transmit across generations. This ripple effect leads to suffering and may perpetuate cycles of violence. The framework I propose for identifying passive participants of conflict aims to fill the gaps of traditional post-conflict models of justice in order to transform these passive experiences of injury from conflict. My hope is that by healing these injuries, we may end cycles of violence and live together in peace, joy, and harmony.

0 Comments



Leave a Reply.

    part of Kate's Mural

    idea incubator & 
    prototype lab 
     . . . architecting hope . . .  


    Featured
    Guest Posts
    101
    21st Century Career
    Changemakers
    Creative
    Design
    Ethics
    Learning
    Leadership
    Life Lessons
    Social Impact

    Sectors
    Aging
    Education
    Health
    Macroscope
    Social Enterprise

    Themes
    Wildflower (thoughts)
    Idea (seeds)
    Prototype (experiments)

    Failures
    Fun
    Future/Innovation

    About this blog
    About Kate
    View my profile on LinkedIn
    Picture
    All writing licensed by
    Kate Michi Ettinger and guest contributors under a
    Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 United States License.

    RSS Feed

    Archives

    April 2016
    March 2015
    January 2015
    March 2014
    February 2014
    January 2014
    October 2013
    May 2013
    April 2013
    February 2013
    November 2012
    August 2012
    April 2012
    March 2012
    February 2012
    January 2012
    December 2011
    March 2011
    September 2010
    August 2010
    June 2010
    November 2009
    October 2009
    July 2008
    May 2008
    April 2008
    March 2008
    February 2008
    October 2007
    July 2007
    June 2007